
FirePro M6100

GeForce MX250
FirePro M6100 vs GeForce MX250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M6100 vs GeForce MX250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M6100 vs GeForce MX250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M6100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.
GeForce MX250
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅FirePro M6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX250 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6100 vs GeForce MX250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 versus the GeForce MX250's 2,375 — the FirePro M6100 leads by 5.1%. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495+5% | 2,375 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+147% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+133% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+56% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M6100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6100 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX250. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6100) vs 512 KB (GeForce MX250) — the GeForce MX250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (GeForce MX250). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 175% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 10W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 237.5+1331% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M6100 came in at $0, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro M6100 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the FirePro M6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX250 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 15.8 |
| Codename | Emerald | GP108B |
| Release | May 27 2014 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #638 | #643 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















