G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro M6100

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.

GeForce MX250

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro M6100: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro M6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

FirePro M6100

2014

GeForce MX250

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro M6100: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro M6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro M6100 better than GeForce MX250?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,495 vs 2,375 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro M6100 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX250 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014 and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

FirePro M6100 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro M6100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 5.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce MX250 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce MX250 make more sense than FirePro M6100?

Yes. GeForce MX250 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (10W vs 150W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $150 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro M6100. The trade-off is that FirePro M6100 currently gives you 5.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce MX250 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro M6100 Benchmark Check

GeForce MX250 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
1080p
low	48 FPS	20 FPS
medium	29 FPS	12 FPS
high	21 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	4 FPS
1440p
low	32 FPS	9 FPS
medium	19 FPS	5 FPS
high	10 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	4 FPS
medium	7 FPS	2 FPS
high	4 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	1 FPS

Open FirePro M6100 Open GeForce MX250

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
1080p
low	69 FPS	61 FPS
medium	43 FPS	34 FPS
high	32 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	15 FPS
1440p
low	33 FPS	18 FPS
medium	20 FPS	11 FPS
high	13 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	9 FPS	5 FPS
medium	6 FPS	3 FPS
high	5 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	2 FPS

Open FirePro M6100 Open GeForce MX250

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
1080p
low	112 FPS	107 FPS
medium	90 FPS	86 FPS
high	75 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	53 FPS
1440p
low	84 FPS	80 FPS
medium	67 FPS	64 FPS
high	56 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	56 FPS	53 FPS
medium	45 FPS	43 FPS
high	37 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	27 FPS

Open FirePro M6100 Open GeForce MX250

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
1080p
low	112 FPS	73 FPS
medium	90 FPS	57 FPS
high	75 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	13 FPS
medium	64 FPS	10 FPS
high	54 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	44 FPS	9 FPS
medium	33 FPS	7 FPS
high	27 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	4 FPS

Open FirePro M6100 Open GeForce MX250

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6100 and GeForce MX250

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

GeForce MX250

The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 versus the GeForce MX250's 2,375 — the FirePro M6100 leads by 5.1%. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250).

Feature	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
G3D Mark Score	2,495+5%	2,375
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.971 TFLOPS+147%	0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	224 KB+56%	144 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX250 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro M6100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6100) vs 512 KB (GeForce MX250) — the GeForce MX250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (GeForce MX250). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250).

Feature	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
Encoder	VCE 2.0	None
Decoder	UVD 4.2	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 175% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

Feature	FirePro M6100	GeForce MX250
TDP	150W	10W-93%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	75-12%
Perf/Watt	16.6	237.5+1331%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M6100 launched at $0 MSRP, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150. The FirePro M6100 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the FirePro M6100 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce MX250 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).