FirePro M6100 vs GRID M3-3020

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6100 vs GRID M3-3020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M6100 vs GRID M3-3020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6100

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

GRID M3-3020

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M3-3020 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,500 vs 2,495), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M6100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M3-3020 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M3-3020 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M6100 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M6100 vs GRID M3-3020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

GRID M3-3020

The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the GRID M3-3020 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID M3-3020 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 640 (GRID M3-3020). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020).

Feature	FirePro M6100	GRID M3-3020
G3D Mark Score	2,495	2,500
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+40%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.971 TFLOPS+18%	1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	224 KB	320 KB+43%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M6100	GRID M3-3020
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6100 and 64-bit on the GRID M3-3020. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M6100) vs 2 MB (GRID M3-3020) — the GRID M3-3020 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M6100	GRID M3-3020
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the GRID M3-3020's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (GRID M3-3020). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro M6100	GRID M3-3020
TDP	150W-40%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	16.6+66%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6100 came in at $0, while the GRID M3-3020 launched at $1000. On MSRP, FirePro M6100 was 100+% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs 2.5 (GRID M3-3020) — the FirePro M6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M3-3020 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro M6100	GRID M3-3020
MSRP	$0-100%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	2.5
Codename	Emerald	GM107
Release	May 27 2014	May 18 2016
Ranking	#638	#587

Search FirePro M6100 on Amazon

Search GRID M3-3020 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.