
FirePro M6100 vs GeForce GTX 470M SLI

FirePro M6100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6100.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M6100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6100 and GeForce GTX 470M SLI

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI
The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the GeForce GTX 470M SLI reaches 2,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 470M SLI uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 576 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495 | 2,540+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+56% | 576 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 11 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (GeForce GTX 470M SLI). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 470M SLI's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 470M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 90.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85-6% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 33.9+104% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M6100 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.2 (FirePro M6100) vs 42.3 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) — the FirePro M6100 offers 96.7% better value. The FirePro M6100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-50% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.2+97% | 42.3 |
| Codename | Emerald | N11E-GT |
| Release | May 27 2014 | November 1 2010 |
| Ranking | #638 | #627 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















