FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M6100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
FireStream 9370
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the FireStream 9370 reaches 2,528 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FireStream 9370 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9370). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495 | 2,528+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1600+79% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 2.64 TFLOPS+34% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+40% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M6100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9370 carries 4 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6100 and 64-bit on the FireStream 9370. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6100) vs 512 KB (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 11.2 (FireStream 9370). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (FireStream 9370). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the FireStream 9370's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (FireStream 9370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6+48% | 11.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M6100 came in at $0, while the FireStream 9370 launched at $800. On MSRP, FirePro M6100 was 100+% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs 3.2 (FireStream 9370) — the FirePro M6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M6100 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 3.2 |
| Codename | Emerald | Cypress |
| Release | May 27 2014 | June 23 2010 |
| Ranking | #638 | #631 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















