
FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9370

FirePro M6100
Popular choices:

FireStream 9370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6100.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M6100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6100 and FireStream 9370

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the FireStream 9370 reaches 2,528 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FireStream 9370 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9370). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495 | 2,528+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1600+79% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 2.64 TFLOPS+34% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+40% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M6100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9370 has 4 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6100) vs 512 KB (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 11.2 (FireStream 9370). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (FireStream 9370). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the FireStream 9370's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (FireStream 9370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6+48% | 11.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FireStream 9370 launched at $800 and now averages $50. The FirePro M6100 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.2 (FirePro M6100) vs 50.6 (FireStream 9370) — the FirePro M6100 offers 64.4% better value. The FirePro M6100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.2+64% | 50.6 |
| Codename | Emerald | Cypress |
| Release | May 27 2014 | June 23 2010 |
| Ranking | #638 | #631 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















