FirePro M6100
VS
FireStream 9370

FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9370

FirePro M6100

2014Core: 1100 MHz
VS

FireStream 9370

2010Core: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9370

#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
93%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
92%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
90%
#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
84%
#231
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4675%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
100%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
100%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
92%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
91%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
90%
#254
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
86%
#255
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
86%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
86%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
84%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
84%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
84%
#261
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FireStream 9370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6100.

InsightFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M6100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+64.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6100 and FireStream 9370

AMD

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

AMD

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the FireStream 9370 reaches 2,528 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FireStream 9370 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9370). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370).

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
G3D Mark Score
2,495
2,528+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896
1600+79%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.971 TFLOPS
2.64 TFLOPS+34%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
224 KB+40%
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9370 has 4 GB. The FireStream 9370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6100) vs 512 KB (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 11.2 (FireStream 9370). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
DirectX
12+7%
11.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (FireStream 9370). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370).

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
Encoder
VCE 2.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the FireStream 9370's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (FireStream 9370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
16.6+48%
11.2
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FireStream 9370 launched at $800 and now averages $50. The FirePro M6100 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.2 (FirePro M6100) vs 50.6 (FireStream 9370) — the FirePro M6100 offers 64.4% better value. The FirePro M6100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro M6100FireStream 9370
MSRP
$0-100%
$800
Avg Price (30d)
$30-40%
$50
Performance per Dollar
83.2+64%
50.6
Codename
Emerald
Cypress
Release
May 27 2014
June 23 2010
Ranking
#638
#631