FirePro 3D V8800
VS
FirePro M6100

FirePro 3D V8800 vs FirePro M6100

FirePro 3D V8800

2010Core: 690 MHz
VS

FirePro M6100

2014Core: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V8800 is positioned at rank #312 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8800

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
96%
#297
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9063%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
100%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
98%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
97%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
96%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
94%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
94%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
93%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
93%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
93%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
91%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
87%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
85%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
85%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8800.

InsightFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M6100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2.3%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8800 and FirePro M6100

AMD

FirePro 3D V8800

The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the FirePro M6100 reaches 2,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M6100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 896 (FirePro M6100). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
G3D Mark Score
2,438
2,495+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS+79%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
80 KB
224 KB+180%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 12 (FirePro M6100). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
DirectX
11.2
12+7%
Vulkan
None
1.2
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V8800) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs H.264 (FirePro M6100).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
Encoder
None
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the FirePro M6100's 150W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (FirePro M6100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
TDP
74W-51%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
85
Perf/Watt
32.9+98%
16.6
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V8800 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro M6100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.3 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 83.2 (FirePro M6100) — the FirePro M6100 offers 2.3% better value. The FirePro M6100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FirePro M6100
MSRP
$1499
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$30
Performance per Dollar
81.3
83.2+2%
Codename
Juniper
Emerald
Release
April 26 2010
May 27 2014
Ranking
#780
#638