
FirePro 3D V8800

FireStream 9370
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V8800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 225W, a 151W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌87.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
FireStream 9370
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌204.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 74W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

FireStream 9370
The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the FireStream 9370 reaches 2,528 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FireStream 9370 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9370). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,438 | 2,528+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1600+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 2.64 TFLOPS+139% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 160 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9370 carries 4 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8800 and 64-bit on the FireStream 9370. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 512 KB (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 11.2 (FireStream 9370). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V8800) vs None (FireStream 9370). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the FireStream 9370's 225W — a 101% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (FireStream 9370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9+194% | 11.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V8800 came in at $1499, while the FireStream 9370 launched at $800. On MSRP, FireStream 9370 was 46.6% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 3.2 (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 offers 100% better value.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | FireStream 9370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $800-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 3.2+100% |
| Codename | Juniper | Cypress |
| Release | April 26 2010 | June 23 2010 |
| Ranking | #780 | #631 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















