FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370

FirePro 3D V8800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

FireStream 9370

2010Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8800

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 74W instead of 225W, a 151W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

FireStream 9370

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $699 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 94.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 204.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 74W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FireStream 9370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (2,528 vs 2,438), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V8800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $699 cheaper on MSRP at $800 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 94.3% (3.2 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FireStream 9370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V8800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs FireStream 9370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8800

The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the FireStream 9370 reaches 2,528 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FireStream 9370 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9370). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2.64 TFLOPS (FireStream 9370).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
G3D Mark Score
2,438
2,528+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
1600+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
2.64 TFLOPS+139%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
80 KB
160 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9370 carries 4 GB. FireStream 9370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8800 and 64-bit on the FireStream 9370. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 512 KB (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 11.2 (FireStream 9370). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
DirectX
11.2
11.2
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V8800) vs None (FireStream 9370). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9370).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the FireStream 9370's 225W — a 101% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (FireStream 9370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
TDP
74W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
32.9+194%
11.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8800 came in at $1499, while the FireStream 9370 launched at $800. On MSRP, FireStream 9370 was 46.6% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 3.2 (FireStream 9370) — the FireStream 9370 offers 100% better value.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800FireStream 9370
MSRP
$1499
$800-47%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
3.2+100%
Codename
Juniper
Cypress
Release
April 26 2010
June 23 2010
Ranking
#780
#631

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.