
FirePro 3D V8800

GRID M10-1Q
FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M10-1Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M10-1Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M10-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V8800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 74W instead of 225W, a 151W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M10-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌204.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 74W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M10-1Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,438+2% | 2,385 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+337% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 768 KB+860% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8800 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_1+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 101% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9+210% | 10.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V8800 came in at $1499, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0. On MSRP, GRID M10-1Q was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs Infinity (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-1Q (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | GM204 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #525 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















