FirePro 3D V8800 vs Radeon RX 550X

FirePro 3D V8800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550X

2018Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V8800 vs Radeon RX 550X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs Radeon RX 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8800

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1275.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon RX 550X

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,390 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1243.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • FirePro 3D V8800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V8800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (2,438 vs 2,381), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro 3D V8800 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,390 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1243.1% (21.8 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro 3D V8800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs Radeon RX 550X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V8800

The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon RX 550X

The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
G3D Mark Score
2,438+2%
2,381
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+56%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro 3D V8800 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8800 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550X. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
DirectX
11.2
12+7%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V8800) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
UVD 2.3
VCE
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
TDP
74W
50W-32%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
267mm
145mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.9
47.6+45%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8800 came in at $1499, while the Radeon RX 550X launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550X was 92.7% cheaper ($1390 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 21.8 (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X offers 1262.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (2018 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V8800Radeon RX 550X
MSRP
$1499
$109-93%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
21.8+1262%
Codename
Juniper
Lexa
Release
April 26 2010
December 16 2018
Ranking
#780
#642

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.