FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M40
FirePro 3D V8800
Popular choices:
GRID M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V8800 is positioned at rank 312 and the GRID M40 is on rank 265, so the GRID M40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8800
Performance Per Dollar GRID M40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M40 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M40 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M40 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8800.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V8800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V8800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 225.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+225.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8800 and GRID M40
FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.
GRID M40
The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the GRID M40 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M40 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 384 (GRID M40). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,438 | 2,500+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+39% | 0.7933 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2 MB (GRID M40) — the GRID M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the GRID M40's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (GRID M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 50W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9 | 50.0+52% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V8800 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M40 launched at $1000 and now averages $100. The FirePro 3D V8800 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.3 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 25.0 (GRID M40) — the FirePro 3D V8800 offers 225.2% better value. The GRID M40 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $1000-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-70% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.3+225% | 25.0 |
| Codename | Juniper | GM107 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #780 | #742 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V8800 and GRID M40
