FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M40

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8800

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
49.9% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
❌48% higher power demand at 74W vs 50W.

GRID M40

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 74W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M40 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (2,500 vs 2,438), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V8800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M40 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $499 cheaper on MSRP at $1,000 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 53.7% (2.5 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M40 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V8800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V8800 vs GRID M40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V8800

The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

GRID M40

The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the GRID M40 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M40 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 384 (GRID M40). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8800	GRID M40
G3D Mark Score	2,438	2,500+3%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS+39%	0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	80 KB	192 KB+140%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V8800	GRID M40
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8800 and 64-bit on the GRID M40. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2 MB (GRID M40) — the GRID M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8800	GRID M40
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the GRID M40's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (GRID M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8800	GRID M40
TDP	74W	50W-32%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	32.9	50.0+52%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8800 came in at $1499, while the GRID M40 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GRID M40 was 33.3% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 2.5 (GRID M40) — the GRID M40 offers 56.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID M40 (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8800	GRID M40
MSRP	$1499	$1000-33%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	2.5+56%
Codename	Juniper	GM107
Release	April 26 2010	May 18 2016
Ranking	#780	#742

Search FirePro 3D V8800 on Amazon

Search GRID M40 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.