FirePro M6100 vs Moore Threads MTT S80
FirePro M6100
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro M6100 is significantly newer (2014 vs 0). The FirePro M6100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6100.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $170 for the Moore Threads MTT S80, it costs 82% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 462.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+462.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($170) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6100 and Moore Threads MTT S80
FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the Moore Threads MTT S80 reaches 2,513 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495 | 2,513 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | MUSA |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4096+357% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+648% |
| ROPs | 16 | 256+1500% |
| TMUs | 56 | 256+357% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M6100) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 51.9% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-41% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6+68% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260 and now averages $170. The FirePro M6100 costs 82.4% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.2 (FirePro M6100) vs 14.8 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the FirePro M6100 offers 462.2% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $260 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-82% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.2+462% | 14.8 |
| Codename | Emerald | Chunxiao |
| Release | May 27 2014 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #638 | #635 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M6100 and Moore Threads MTT S80
