
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅20% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 240).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅20% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 240).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design's 11,461 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 23.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1185 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) with 240 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+23% | 11,461 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+18% | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+42% | 1185 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 2.3 MB+21% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 36+20% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 288+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 384 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 143.3+62% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













