GeForce RTX 2060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 14,909 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 5.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 240 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 14,909+6% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3072+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 12.99 TFLOPS+101% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2115 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+25% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 3 MB+58% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+25% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+150% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+31% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (Ada) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (Ada) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 298.2+238% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | AD107 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #168 | #155 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
