
GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 80).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌16.3% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 and the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile reaches 14,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) with 240 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 14,332+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1755 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 2.5 MB+32% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+50% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+200% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2060 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+100% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 286.6+225% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile was 14% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 18.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $300-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 47.8+18% |
| Codename | TU106 | AD107 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #168 | #166 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















