
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅7.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 224).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 220W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 245mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅71.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌37.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅7.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 224).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 220W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 245mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅71.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌37.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 695 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,958 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 112.3%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) with 240 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 29,958+112% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 7168+273% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS+450% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2475 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224+87% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 7 MB+268% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 56+87% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 504 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 31.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 229mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-27% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 229mm | 245mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | 70°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 136.2+54% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 41.7% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 23.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-42% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 50.0+24% |
| Codename | TU106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #168 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













