
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 192).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 245mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅76.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 30% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 192).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 245mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅76.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 30% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 105 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 594 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 289 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and GeForce RTX 5070

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GeForce RTX 5070's 28,854 — the GeForce RTX 5070 leads by 104.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5070 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2512 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 (GeForce RTX 5070) with 240 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 28,854+104% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 6144+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 30.87 TFLOPS+379% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2512 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 120 | 192+60% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 6 MB+216% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 48+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+25% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 5070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 672 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 5070's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 229mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 229mm | 245mm |
| Height | 113mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 115.4+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 36.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 30.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce RTX 5070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-36% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 52.6+30% |
| Codename | TU106 | GB205 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 4 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #22 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













