G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅11874.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1500% higher power demand at 160W vs 10W.
❌38.8% longer card at 229mm vs 165mm.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 160W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 229mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11874.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 470366.7% in PassMark G3D (14,114 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and 30 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 2060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 470366.7%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
G3D Mark Score	14,114+470367%	3
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1920+400%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+709%	0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz+62%	1038 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	120+400%	24
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+1257%	0.14 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+71%	7.0
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+283%	1.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	None
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	None
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 176.5% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 55.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
TDP	160W	10W-94%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	165mm
Height	113mm	64mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	72	55-24%
Perf/Watt	88.2+29300%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GeForce2 MX 100/200
MSRP	$349	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	40.4	Infinity
Codename	TU106	GP108
Release	January 7 2019	May 17 2017
Ranking	#168	#657

Search GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon

Search GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.