
GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce3 Ti 200
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce3 Ti 200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅11874.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 150543.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌25.1% longer card at 229mm vs 183mm.
GeForce3 Ti 200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅53.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 240).
- ✅Measures 183mm instead of 229mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce3 Ti 200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 4 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 352750%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GeForce3 Ti 200 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 46 (GeForce3 Ti 200) with 240 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+352750% | 4 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2944+53% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 10.07 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1710 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 184+53% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 2.9 MB+53% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 46+53% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 368+53% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce3 Ti 200 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+48% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+254% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GeForce3 Ti 200's 215W — a 29.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 183mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 60.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-26% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 183mm |
| Height | 113mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | 60-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the GeForce3 Ti 200 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce3 Ti 200 was 57.3% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GeForce3 Ti 200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $149-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 0.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | TU104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #94 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















