
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1838.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 594.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID K140Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019GRID K140Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1838.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 594.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GRID K140Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID K140Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 8 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 8 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 8 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and GRID K140Q

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GRID K140Q
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GRID K140Q's 728 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1838.7%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+1839% | 728 |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+25% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+182% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+1362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K140Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+2656% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125. The GRID K140Q costs 64.2% less ($224 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.8 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 596.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $125-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+597% | 5.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #168 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













