G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+455.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 695.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
43.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅+455.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 695.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
43.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GRID K240Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 2,541 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GRID K240Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013, 455.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 2060 is about $151 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 455.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 695.8%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GRID K240Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GRID K240Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 2060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

GRID K240Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	108 FPS	102 FPS
medium	98 FPS	83 FPS
high	82 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	85 FPS
medium	83 FPS	69 FPS
high	69 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	28 FPS
medium	43 FPS	26 FPS
high	31 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open GRID K240Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	290 FPS	88 FPS
medium	247 FPS	62 FPS
high	197 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	48 FPS
medium	164 FPS	31 FPS
high	131 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	18 FPS
medium	91 FPS	12 FPS
high	75 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open GRID K240Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	635 FPS	114 FPS
medium	508 FPS	91 FPS
high	423 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	86 FPS
medium	381 FPS	69 FPS
high	318 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	57 FPS
medium	254 FPS	46 FPS
high	212 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open GRID K240Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	428 FPS	114 FPS
medium	354 FPS	91 FPS
high	286 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	86 FPS
medium	302 FPS	69 FPS
high	235 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	57 FPS
medium	166 FPS	46 FPS
high	154 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open GRID K240Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and GRID K240Q

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the GRID K240Q's 2,541 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 455.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score	14,114+455%	2,541
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1920+25%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+182%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	120	128+7%
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+1362%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K240Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K240Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%	11_0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	—
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	—
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	GRID K240Q
TDP	160W-29%	225W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	1mm
Height	113mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	72-10%	80°C
Perf/Watt	88.2+681%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 30.2% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.1 (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 692.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).