
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- β +716.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,729 vs 14,114).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- β +716.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,729 vs 14,114).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Iris Plus Graphics 655?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Plus Graphics 655 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Iris Plus Graphics 655

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 1,729 β the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 716.3%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+716% | 1,729 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 1920+400% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+700% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+60% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+700% | 6 |
| TMUs | 120+150% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W β a 165.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 115.3+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) β the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU106 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #723 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













