
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- β +326.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β471.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 28W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 160W, a 132W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 14,114).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020Why buy it
- β +326.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 160W, a 132W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β471.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 14,114).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 3,311 β the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 326.3%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+326% | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Turing | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+1900% | 96 |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+24% | 1350 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W β a 140.4% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 28W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | β |
| Height | 113mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 118.3+34% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) β the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #536 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













