
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

NVS 310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+5032.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2238.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 68W.
- ❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.
NVS 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 160W, a 92W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (275 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019NVS 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅+5032.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2238.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 160W, a 92W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 68W.
- ❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (275 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than NVS 310?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is NVS 310 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 3 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and NVS 310

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

NVS 310
NVS 310
The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the NVS 310's 275 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 5032.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the NVS 310 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 512 (NVS 310). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+5032% | 275 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+275% | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+510% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+63% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 120+275% | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+660% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The NVS 310 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 310 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (NVS 310) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 310). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Fermi NVENC (NVS 310). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (NVS 310).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | Fermi NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the NVS 310's 68W — a 80.7% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (NVS 310). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 68W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 145mm |
| Height | 113mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+2105% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the NVS 310 launched at $159. The NVS 310 costs 54.4% less ($190 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.7 (NVS 310) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 2276.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | NVS 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $159-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+2276% | 1.7 |
| Codename | TU106 | GM107 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #168 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













