
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+112.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 36.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $125 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+112.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 36.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $125 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than P106-100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is P106-100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and P106-100

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

P106-100
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the P106-100's 6,628 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 112.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+113% | 6,628 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1733 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+171% | 0.7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P106-100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the P106-100 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 250mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 88.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the P106-100 launched at $224. The P106-100 costs 35.8% less ($125 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 29.6 (P106-100) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 36.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $224-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+36% | 29.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













