GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro 400

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 400

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1252 MHz

GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro 400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro 400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…4057.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Delivers 4518% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • βœ…Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • βœ…1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • βœ…Better long-term bet: Turing (2018βˆ’2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
  • ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $180 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
  • βœ…Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 2060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4057.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 9436.5% in PassMark G3D (14,114 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and 30 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $180 more expensive on MSRP at $349 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4518% (40.4 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro 400's 148 β€” the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 9436.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1252 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Quadro 400
G3D Mark Score
14,114+9436%
148
Architecture
Turing
Pascal
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1920+650%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.451 TFLOPS+906%
0.641 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1680 MHz+34%
1252 MHz
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
120+650%
16
L1 Cache
1.9 MB+2011%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Quadro 400
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 64-bit on the Quadro 400. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) β€” the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Quadro 400
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
0.5 MB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Quadro 400
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)+20%
10_1
Max Displays
4+100%
2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro 400's 30W β€” a 136.8% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Quadro 400
TDP
160W
30W-81%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
113mm
β€”
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
72
β€”
Perf/Watt
88.2+1700%
4.9
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169. On MSRP, Quadro 400 was 51.6% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.9 (Quadro 400) β€” the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 4388.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2060Quadro 400
MSRP
$349
$169-52%
Performance per Dollar
40.4+4389%
0.9
Codename
TU106
GP107
Release
January 7 2019
February 7 2017
Ranking
#168
#741

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.