
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro FX Go1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅6186.0% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro FX Go1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro FX Go1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅6186.0% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro FX Go1400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro FX Go1400 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 1 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro FX Go1400

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro FX Go1400
Quadro FX Go1400
The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 102 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 13737.3%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+13737% | 102 |
| Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+900% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+1295% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1479% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro FX Go1400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1479% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+12500% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | GT200B |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #168 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













