
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro K4200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+225.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌48.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 108W.
Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 160W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,332 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅+225.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 160W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌48.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 108W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,332 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro K4200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K4200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 49 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro K4200

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro K4200's 4,332 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 225.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 784 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+226% | 4,332 |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+43% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+206% | 2.107 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+114% | 784 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+1627% | 0.11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K4200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12_0 (Quadro K4200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W — a 38.8% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 108W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+120% | 40.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro K4200 launched at $0. The Quadro K4200 costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (Quadro K4200) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #168 | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













