
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅170.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2433.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌31.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 122W.
Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 160W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌616% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅170.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2433.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 160W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 122W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌616% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro K5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro K5000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro K5000
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro K5000's 3,989 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 253.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 706 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+254% | 3,989 |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+25% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+197% | 2.169 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+138% | 706 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+1362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12_0 (Quadro K5000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 27% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 122W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+170% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 86% less ($2150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.6 (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 2425% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-86% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+2425% | 1.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 17 2012 |
| Ranking | #168 | #492 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













