GeForce RTX 2060
Quadro K6000
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro K6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro K6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro K6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅43.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,916 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2563.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1408.6% HIGHER MSRP$5,265 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro K6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro K6000's 7,993 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 76.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+77% | 7,993 |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2880+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+24% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+86% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 120 | 240+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+726% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 59.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 256-bit on the Quadro K6000. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+59% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 265mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 265mm |
| Height | 113mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+148% | 35.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Quadro K6000 launched at $5265. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 93.4% cheaper ($4916 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.5 (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 2593.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-93% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+2593% | 1.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | GK110B |
| Release | January 7 2019 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #168 | #318 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro K6000
