
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+250.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌37.1% longer card at 229mm vs 167mm.
Quadro M2000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 229mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,026 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro M2000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+250.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 229mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌37.1% longer card at 229mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,026 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro M2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro M2000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro M2000's 4,026 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 250.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1163 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+251% | 4,026 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+150% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+261% | 1.786 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+44% | 1163 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+150% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+579% | 0.28 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 167mm |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+64% | 53.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0. The Quadro M2000 costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU106 | GM206 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #491 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













