
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro M3000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅140.6% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅140.6% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro M3000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M3000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro M3000M

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro M3000M's 5,574 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 153.2%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+153% | 5,574 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+88% | 1,024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+200% | 2.15 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+400% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M3000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M3000M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+19% | 74.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | GM204 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #168 | #411 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













