
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 229mm vs 201mm.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 229mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌22.9% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 229mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 229mm vs 201mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌22.9% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro P2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro P2200

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 50.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+50% | 9,386 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+50% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+69% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+13% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+304% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+20% | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 201mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 125.1+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 18.6% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 84.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-19% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+84% | 21.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP106 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #168 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













