
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+64.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+64.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro P3200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro P3200

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P3200's 8,578 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 64.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+65% | 8,578 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+17% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+9% | 1543 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+188% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 114.4+30% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 30.2% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 134.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+135% | 17.2 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













