
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅19.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $466 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌52.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 105W.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 160W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌133.5% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅19.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $466 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 160W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌52.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌133.5% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro P4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro P4000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P4000's 11,431 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 23.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+23% | 11,431 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+22% | 5.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+14% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+188% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro P4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 41.5% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 105W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 108.9+23% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro P4000 launched at $815. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 57.2% less ($466 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 14.0 (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 188.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-57% | $815 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+189% | 14.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #239 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













