
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+10.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 694% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌616% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+10.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 694% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌616% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 73 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 104 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 10.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+11% | 12,728 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1733 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 160+33% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+102% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+25% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 86% less ($2150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 692.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-86% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+692% | 5.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













