
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1464% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 15,512).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+9.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1618.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1464% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+9.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 15,512).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1618.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P6000 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 2060 make more sense than Quadro P6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro P6000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 9.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 15,512+10% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3840+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+96% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+2% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 240+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+36% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 290.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 23.438 GB+291% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 432 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+42% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 94.2% less ($5650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1453.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-94% | $5999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1454% | 2.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | GP102 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #168 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













