
GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro RTX 3000
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro RTX 3000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro RTX 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+30% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 260W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 3000
2018Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅140% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 240).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,858 vs 14,114).
- ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌129.2% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 260W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 10,858 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 30%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 3000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 3000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+30% | 10,858 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4608+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+153% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1770 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 288+140% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 4.5 MB+137% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 72+140% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 576+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 260W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-38% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+111% | 41.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the Quadro RTX 3000 launched at $800. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2060 was 56.4% cheaper ($451 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 197.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-56% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+197% | 13.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | TU102 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #78 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















