
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,300 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 724.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Quadro RTX A6000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅99.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅40% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 240).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1232.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,300 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 724.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅99.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅40% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 240).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Quadro RTX A6000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1232.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 158 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 784 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 684 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 61.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 22,798+62% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 10752+460% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1800 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 120 | 336+180% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 10.5 MB+453% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 84+180% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 336+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 128.6% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 768 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+16% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 92.5% less ($4300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 724.5% better value. The Quadro RTX A6000 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-92% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+724% | 4.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA102 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













