
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅127.7% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
- ❌46.8% longer card at 229mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 229mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌14.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅127.7% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 229mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
- ❌46.8% longer card at 229mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌14.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Quadro T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Quadro T1000

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Quadro T1000's 6,505 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 117%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+117% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+15% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 156mm |
| Height | 113mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | 65°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 130.1+48% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 12.8% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 147.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-13% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+148% | 16.3 |
| Codename | TU106 | TU117 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #168 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













