
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon 535
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅975.4% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 285.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Radeon 535
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon 535
2017Why buy it
- ✅975.4% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 285.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon 535?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon 535 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 12 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 11 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon 535

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon 535
Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon 535's 1,049 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 1245.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+1245% | 1,049 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+275% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+433% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+42% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+275% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+1362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 535 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 535 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon 535) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+320% | 21.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100. The Radeon 535 costs 71.3% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 284.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $100-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+285% | 10.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | Lexa |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













