GeForce RTX 2060
RADEON 9200 SE
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅11874.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 40341.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌190.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 55W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
RADEON 9200 SE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $319 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 160W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2060 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
RADEON 9200 SE
The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 470366.7%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 40 (RADEON 9200 SE) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+470367% | 3 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+130% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2900 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 160+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 40+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+2300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+48% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+254% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 97.7% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 60.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 55W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | 60-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+88100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2060 came in at $349, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 SE was 91.4% cheaper ($319 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 40300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $30-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+40300% | 0.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 7 2019 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #98 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2060 and RADEON 9200 SE
