
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅51.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌272.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅51.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌272.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon AI PRO R9700 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 297 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 102.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 240 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 28,589+103% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4096+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+642% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2920 MHz+74% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 120 | 256+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 64+113% |
| Tensor Cores | 240+88% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 95.3+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 73.1% less ($950 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 83.6% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-73% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+84% | 22.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 48 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #168 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













