
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅126.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 70.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 160W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅126.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 70.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 160W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5300 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro 5300

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 7,125 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 98.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+98% | 7,125 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+50% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+53% | 4.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+2% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 61.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 85W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+5% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 5300 costs 14% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 69.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $300-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+70% | 23.8 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













