
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+13.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅+13.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 XT make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 12,442 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 13.4%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+13% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+12% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 160+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 130W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 95.7+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 30.2% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 62.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+62% | 24.9 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #168 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













