
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅366.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅366.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 13,130 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 7.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+7% | 13,130 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3584 ×2+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+12% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224 ×2+87% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+116% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 366.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 28 GB+367% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 1.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 158W-1% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+6% | 83.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













