
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+173.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,169 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅+173.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,169 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro Vega 20?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 20 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro Vega 20

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 5,169 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 173.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+173% | 5,169 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+50% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+96% | 3.284 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+31% | 1283 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+513% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+71% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU106 | Vega 12 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #168 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













