
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌71.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌71.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 145 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro Vega 64

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 12,891 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 9.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+9% | 12,891 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4096+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 11.06 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+24% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 256+113% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+90% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+71% | 51.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 41.7% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 87.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-42% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+88% | 21.5 |
| Codename | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #168 | #202 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













