
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 565.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 565.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌530.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 13,369 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 5.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+6% | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4096+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 12.03 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+14% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 256+113% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+90% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+65% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 84.1% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 562.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-84% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+562% | 6.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #168 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













