
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 17,591).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+24.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌186.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+24.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,114 vs 17,591).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌186.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5700X make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 17,591 — the Radeon Pro W5700X leads by 24.6%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 17,591+25% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 9.4 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2040 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Radeon Pro W5700X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 24.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-22% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 305mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+3% | 85.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 65.1% less ($650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 129.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-65% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+130% | 17.6 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #168 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













