GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+153.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 45.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,560 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅+153.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 45.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,560 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon PRO W6300?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 14,114 vs 5,560 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 is a 2019 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon PRO W6300 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 153.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 74.5% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 153.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.5%. Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (25W vs 160W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W6300 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6300 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 160W), and staying closer to $200 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 2060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 2060 currently gives you 153.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.5%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	108 FPS	126 FPS
medium	98 FPS	111 FPS
high	82 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	110 FPS
medium	83 FPS	92 FPS
high	69 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	47 FPS
medium	43 FPS	43 FPS
high	31 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	290 FPS	165 FPS
medium	247 FPS	131 FPS
high	197 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	107 FPS
medium	164 FPS	81 FPS
high	131 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	55 FPS
medium	91 FPS	41 FPS
high	75 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	635 FPS	250 FPS
medium	508 FPS	200 FPS
high	423 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	188 FPS
medium	381 FPS	150 FPS
high	318 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	125 FPS
medium	254 FPS	100 FPS
high	212 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	428 FPS	250 FPS
medium	354 FPS	200 FPS
high	286 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	188 FPS
medium	302 FPS	150 FPS
high	235 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	109 FPS
medium	166 FPS	82 FPS
high	154 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 5,560 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 153.8%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6300) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	14,114+154%	5,560
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1920+150%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+106%	3.133 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz	2040 MHz+21%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	120+150%	48
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+660%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	30+150%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 145.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	160W	25W-84%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	113mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	72	—
Perf/Watt	88.2	222.4+152%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. The Radeon PRO W6300 costs 42.7% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 45.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).