G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅+67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅+67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 14,114).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon PRO W6400?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 67.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 6nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 2060 is about 52.4% more expensive on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 67.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 9.9%. Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 160W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W6400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 160W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 2060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 2060 currently gives you 67.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 9.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	108 FPS	107 FPS
medium	98 FPS	95 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	95 FPS
medium	83 FPS	80 FPS
high	69 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	45 FPS
medium	43 FPS	42 FPS
high	31 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	290 FPS	165 FPS
medium	247 FPS	130 FPS
high	197 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	108 FPS
medium	164 FPS	85 FPS
high	131 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	56 FPS
medium	91 FPS	44 FPS
high	75 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	635 FPS	333 FPS
medium	508 FPS	292 FPS
high	423 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	476 FPS	235 FPS
medium	381 FPS	211 FPS
high	318 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	318 FPS	137 FPS
medium	254 FPS	124 FPS
high	212 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	428 FPS	285 FPS
medium	354 FPS	206 FPS
high	286 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	357 FPS	210 FPS
medium	302 FPS	149 FPS
high	235 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	105 FPS
medium	166 FPS	76 FPS
high	154 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon PRO W6400

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 8,428 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 67.5%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	14,114+67%	8,428
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1920+150%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.451 TFLOPS+80%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz	2331 MHz+39%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	120+150%	48
L1 Cache	1.9 MB+660%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	30+150%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	113mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	72	70°C-3%
Perf/Watt	88.2	168.6+91%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 34.4% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 9.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).